
Building
Careers and Shaping Public Policy |
19 April 2004
The Honorable Judd Gregg
Chair, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce,
Justice, State and the Judiciary
393 Russell Senate Building
Washington DC 20510
Dear Senator Gregg:
I am writing on behalf of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers-United States of America (IEEE-USA) in regards to the FY 2005
budget request for the National Institutes of
Standards and Technology (NIST). While IEEE-USA appreciates and strongly
supports the significant increase in funding for NIST's vital laboratory
program, we are concerned that the increase will not adequately compensate
for the major decrease in funding in the previous fiscal year. We believe
that strong reassurances of stability of funding are necessary. Furthermore,
we oppose the elimination of the Advanced
Technology Program (ATP) and the corresponding reductions to the
Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP)
program.
The ATP provides critical resources for high risk, long term research and
development and relies on cost sharing, peer review and competition to
ensure that only deserving proposals are funded. It is a model for
collaboration between the federal government and the private sector in
funding advanced technologies. Over the past decade, the ATP has awarded 709
projects. Four out of five ATP projects result in new products or processes
introduced into the marketplace, and half of all ATP projects result in a
patent application. One prosthesis technology project alone is projected to
deliver $15 billion in the economy. This is exactly the type of payoff
Americans expect for their
tax dollars.
The MEP, too, has a proven track record of promoting innovation and economic
growth. The MEP has helped over 150,000 small and mid-size businesses to
grow, modernize, and improve productivity. Given the significant benefit it
provides to American innovation, economic prosperity and job creation,
cutting the MEP at this time would be a serious mistake. We understand the
difficult decisions that Congress must make in a very tough budget deficit
environment. However, we believe that eliminating the ATP and reducing the
MEP budget is short sighted and is detrimental to the United States'
international competitiveness. We strongly urge you to support funding the
ATP at the level of $145 million and the MEP at $106 million, as provided in
the FY2004 budget, while sustaining the requested budget for the NIST
laboratory program.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter. IEEE-USA is an
organizational unit of the IEEE. It was created in 1973 to advance the
public good and promote the careers and public-policy interests of the more
than 225,000 electrical, electronics, computer and software engineers who
are U.S. members of the IEEE. The IEEE is the world’s largest technical
professional society. If you have any questions or we can be of further
assistance, please contact Bill Williams, legislative representative for our
Research and Development Policy Committee, at (202) 785-0017
ext. 8331.
Sincerely,
John W. Steadman, Ph.D., P.E.
2004 President
[LETTER TO
HOUSE & SENATE APPROPRIATORS]
| Top of Page | Policy Log | Public Policy Forum
| IEEE-USA |
Last Update: 27
June 2004
Staff Contact: Bill Williams, bill.williams@ieee.org
Copyright ©
2004, The
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
Permission to copy IEEE-USA policy communications is granted for non-commercial uses with
appropriate attribution, unless otherwise indicated. |