Merrill W. Buckley, Jr.
2000 President,
IEEE-United States of America


President's Column

(September - October 2000)

Technology and the U.S. Presidential Candidates

The 43rd U.S. President can expect to encounter a host of technology related issues during his term. How he plans to handle these issues is of particular interest to us when deciding how we will cast our votes on November 7th. This year, as I did on behalf of the IEEE in 1992, I sent a letter to all of the major candidates asking what strategies they plan to apply to meet the technology challenges of the 21st Century. You can view the candidates' responses on the web.

Investment priorities for research and development, information security and privacy, improving technology education in schools, and the controversial H-1B skilled worker visa program are just a few of the thorny issues the next Administration will face. Despite similarities in the major-party candidates' technology platforms, the differences can't be overlooked.

Both major-party candidates support increased funding for development of new technologies and scientific processes. Texas Governor George W. Bush says that -- if elected -- he will make the Research and Experimentation tax credit, which is currently temporary, a permanent tax credit. Bush also pledges to increase the military R&D budget by $20 billion and to double the budget of the National Institutes of Health.

Vice President Al Gore says he, too, will make the Research and Experimentation tax credit permanent, but says his plan would go further to expand the tax credit to include "more innovative companies," and also to ensure that the tax code reflects the short life span and obsolescence of high-tech equipment.

Both Gore and Bush value online privacy, and say they would enact legislation to protect medical records, financial information, and an individual's genetic code. Gore adds that he will call for an "Electronic Bill of Rights for Privacy" to ensure that people know how and why their personal information is being collected. Bush says he will appoint a federal Chief Information Officer (CIO) who will lead and coordinate efforts to facilitate a digital government, including privacy protections.

Both candidates stress that equipping a workforce with the tools necessary to succeed in the technology markets and businesses of tomorrow requires educating that workforce today, with particular attention to K-12 students. Governor Bush proposes a math and science partnership fund of $1 billion that would join states with institutions of higher education. This endeavor would provide an additional $1 billion for enhanced Pell Grants to students who take advanced math and science courses in high school.

Vice President Gore's plan would create a bipartisan consensus to increase the public's awareness of the vital role of science and technology in the health of the nation's economy. He supports funding for rigorous research on what educational strategies work and why, as well as research and development that will advance the state-of-the-art in educational technology. Like Bush, Gore believes that every classroom and library should be connected to the Internet, and indicates he will work to increase investment in training teachers and students in the safe and effective use of the Web.

Employment concerns in the high-tech industry will have to be addressed by the next President. Both major-party candidates agree that increasing the number of H-1B visas will provide temporary relief, and neither camp is willing to say what the level of that increase should be.

Governor Bush suggests the long-term solution lies in his education plan, which provides for additional funding in math and science education. Vice President Gore echoes those ideas endorsing education as well as retraining for minorities and women.

The Bush and Gore camps are both strong proponents of science and technology as drivers of the "New Economy," but much of what separates the two candidates is how much they are willing to spend to carry out their plans for the future. It's our turn now to make a distinction.

IEEE-USA members interested in learning more about technology issues and the 2000 Elections can visit IEEE-USA's Election 2000 Information Resource page.

 


| Top of Page | Intro to IEEE-USA | President's Column | IEEE-USA |


Last Updated: 04 October 2000
Staff Contact: Michell Scott, m.scott@ieee.org

Copyright © 2000 The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Permission granted to copy for non-commercial uses with appropriate attribution.  IEEE newsletter editors are encouraged to reprint this column or portions there-of in their newsletters.